Archbishop Edgar Pena Parra, the “substitute” within the secretariat of state, was the highest-ranking witness to be questioned by protection attorneys for 10 individuals on trial for alleged monetary crimes involving the London property and associated dealings. His testimony was eagerly sought by the protection, provided that he oversaw the ultimate section of the London deal in 2018-2019 in addition to the negotiations with the dealer, Gianluigi Torzi.
Prosecutors have accused Torzi of extorting the Holy See for the 15 million euros in alternate for possession of the constructing, prices he denies. The 9 different defendants have equally denied wrongdoing.
The crux of the London case rests on the passage of possession of the London property to Torzi’s Gutt SA fund on the finish of 2018 after the Vatican determined to prematurely exit one other fund that had invested in it.
Pena Parra accused Torzi of deceiving the Vatican however he additionally recognized his onetime deputy, Archbishop Alberto Perlasca, of getting entered into the cope with Torzi with none approval or authority to signal contracts.
By the point Pena Parra first discovered of the deal Nov. 22, 2018, Perlasca had already signed the contracts giving Torzi efficient management of the property within the type of the 1,000 voting shares in Gutt, whereas the Vatican held 30,000 non-voting shares. The lawyer Perlasca engaged assured the Vatican the deal was in its pursuits, however the lawyer turned out to have ties to Torzi, Pena Parra mentioned.
At a Dec. 22, 2018 assembly with the pope and two individuals exterior to the Vatican who had appeared on the contracts, Pena Parra realized the Vatican had been duped and had acquired “empty packing containers.”
Francis, he mentioned, gave clear, common directions how he wished the catastrophe resolved: “Begin over and lose as little cash as potential,” Pena Parra quoted Francis as saying. “I noticed that it was all a deception.”
Over the following six months, Pena Parra and a staff negotiated an exit technique with Torzi after ruling out “riskier” authorized motion towards him. After initially hoping to pay a most of three million euros, the Vatican acquired a proposal from Torzi’s attorneys for 25 million euros, lowered to fifteen million, Pena Parra instructed the court docket.
“For me it was profoundly painful that we needed to pay 15 million euros for this, however it was the one chance,” he mentioned. “We have been pressured into it. Torzi had all the ability and we couldn’t do something about it.”
“It actually was a Through Crucis,” he mentioned, referring to Christ’s ultimate moments earlier than his crucifixion.
Perlasca was initially a primary suspect within the investigation, however flipped in August 2020, began cooperating with prosecutors and have become their star witness. He was by no means charged and is taken into account an injured occasion within the case.
The investigation was triggered after Pena Parra sought a 150 million euro mortgage from the Vatican financial institution to extinguish the mortgage on the property, contemplating the 1 million euro month-to-month mortgage cost too onerous. Initially the financial institution, often known as IOR, agreed however by July 2019 refused and reported the entire deal as suspicious to Vatican prosecutors.
Pena Parra was nonetheless bitter with the financial institution Thursday, claiming the Holy See misplaced some six months in unnecessary mortgage funds, since he rapidly secured the mortgage from one other Vatican workplace after the IOR delivered its detrimental verdict.